Posted by ShaneG on Nov 13, 2013 in Science | 1 comment
How credible is the artificial Moon hypothesis?
Views so far:
So why even consider such an outlandish theory? Isn’t the matter settled? The cosmic dust coagulating into gaseous blobs, solidifying into planets, smaller blobs coagulating into natural satellites, and so on. Doesn’t the conventional model sufficiently explain the Moon?
Interestingly, it doesn’t QUITE explain it! (Ooh, I know that any scientist reading this will spit at this point and close his browser). Still, there are at least three major theories about the origin of the Moon, and each one has serious problems. Weirdly – the one theory which explains the most questions about it is also the most unacceptable and “controversial”, i.e. the “artificial Moon theory”.
In a nutshell, here is a brief summary of what these theories are. (1) The Moon was “blasted out of the Earth” by a giant asteroid or comet. (2) The Moon was an external body (from another, possibly exploded, solar system) and launched towards the Earth where it was captured by our grativational pull. (3) The Moon was engineered and placed here by some highly advanced interstellar civilization aeons ago…!
So why have all these theories and why are they supposedly unsatisfactory?
Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon, by Dan Wilson
Out Occulted History, by Jim Marrs
Was this answer helpful?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Absolutely NO spam!
Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress